首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

心证自由的层次性分析及其客观化制约
引用本文:杨兵,鲁珺瑛. 心证自由的层次性分析及其客观化制约[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2004, 0(5): 102-105
作者姓名:杨兵  鲁珺瑛
作者单位:中国政法大学,北京,100086;北京石油化工学院,北京,102617
摘    要:心证自由有两个层次 ,即狭义上的心证自由和广义上的心证自由。自由心证制度将会受到更多制约是大势所趋。其主要受心证主体客观条件、诉讼程序内在规律、证据法律规则、经验和逻辑规则、心证公开制度的制约。要使自由心证制度在我国走向理性化、规范化必须提高法官队伍的素质 ,改革审判委员会制度和错案追究制 ,推动我国现有诉讼模式尽快向当事人主义过渡 ,并切实保障心证过程公开化

关 键 词:心证自由  层次性  客观化制约  实现途径
文章编号:1008-7966(2004)05-0102-04
修稿时间:2004-06-02

Layered Analysis And Objective Restriction On Freedom of Proof With Intimate Conviction
YANG Bing,LU Jun-Ying. Layered Analysis And Objective Restriction On Freedom of Proof With Intimate Conviction[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2004, 0(5): 102-105
Authors:YANG Bing  LU Jun-Ying
Abstract:There are two layers of freedom of proof with intimate conviction: the freedom in narrow sense and the freedom in broad sense. It is an inevitable tendency that the system of discretional evaluation of evidence will be restrained by more factors, such as objectification of the subject of proof with intimate conviction, the inherent regularities of civil procedure, the rules of evidence, the experiential and logical rules and the open system of proof with intimate conviction. To make our system of discretional evaluation of evidence more rational and normal, it is essential to enhance the character of the judges group, reform the system of judicial committee and the mechanism of finding out misjudged cases, force our current procedural model to transform to adversary system as soon as possible, and ensure effectively the process of proof with intimate conviction in public.
Keywords:freedom of proof with intimate conviction  layered analysis  objective restriction  means of realization  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号