首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

关于挪用犯罪几个问题的思考
引用本文:耿国美.关于挪用犯罪几个问题的思考[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2014(4):46-49.
作者姓名:耿国美
作者单位:华东政法大学教育研究生院,上海,200042
摘    要:挪用特定款物罪是我国刑法最早规制的挪用犯罪,随着经济发达和社会进步,刑法规定了挪用公款罪和挪用资金罪.挪用公款和挪用资金罪都属于挪用类型的犯罪,两者主要区别是主体不同.国家工作人员为了个人使用目的而挪用特定款物的应当认定为挪用公款罪.从犯罪主体的重要性,即身份犯的原则出发,非国家工作人员挪用特定款物应该定为挪用资金罪.“挪用”一词在三个罪名中大同小异,挪用公款罪和挪用资金罪的显著特点是挪用的私利性和有归还的意思,而挪用特定款物则不具有私利性且不以有归还的意思为前提.

关 键 词:挪用犯罪  犯罪主体  个人使用  私利性

Several Problems about the Crime of Embezzlement
Authors:GENG Guo-mei
Institution:GENG Guo-mei
Abstract:The earliest regulation of the crime of embezzlement in our country is money and goods, then along with the development of economic and society, defines the appropriation of particular crime of embezzlement and misappropriation of funds. The crime of misappropriation of funds and embezzlement belong to appropriate types of crime, the main difference is the subject. The crime of misappropriation of particular money and goods specified in the state personnel to specific funds for personal use as embezzlement is legitimate and reasonable. On the importance of crime subject, namely the principle of status crime, non-state staff misappropriation of particular money and goods should be as the crime of embezzlement. The term "appropriation" in three charges is same, the distinctive features of the crime of embezzlement and misappropriation of funds is appropriation of self-interest and the sense of the return, and the misappropriation of particular money and goods are not selfish and not on the premise of the sense of the return.
Keywords:the crime of embezzlement  subject  personal use  interestedness
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号