行政规划的法律性质研究——与王青斌先生商榷

行政规划法律性质的不同观点有单一性质说和非单一性质说等,各有其优点和不足。行政规划并不现实地产生、变更或消灭权利义务关系,人们的传统观念认为只有通过后续行为才能现实化,规划本身不以法律效果为目的。但这种观念值得反思,影响和限制也是行政机关追求的效果,某些细部的、具体的强制性规划的影响和限制具有"直接性"和"必然性",应视为直接的法律效果。行政规划分别构成不同的行政行为和事实行为,并有自身的特点。目前对于"规划确定程序"有诸多的认识误区,规划和确定规划裁决是两个独立的行为,规划的性质由规划的自身内容和因素决定,那种认为只能由"确定规划裁决"的性质决定规划的性质的观点是不妥当的。具体的强制性规划的争议解决应针对规划本身,而不是针对后续行为,以尽早化解矛盾。

The Legal Nature of Administrative Planning:A Response to Mr. Wang Qing-bin

The competing theories of the legal nature of administrative planning cover the mono-nature doctrine and the multi-nature doctrine,both of which have their merits as well as demerits.Administrative planning per se does not imply practically incurring,altering or fulfilling right or obligation.Traditionally,it is thought that only with afterward operations can right and obligation be put into practice,and legal effect is hardly the inherent purpose of planning.However,such a notion should be put under suspic...