The co-regulation of medical discipline: challenging medical peer review |
| |
Authors: | Thomas David |
| |
Affiliation: | School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia. |
| |
Abstract: | The medical profession has always fiercely defended its right to self-regulation on the basis of peer review. However, in New South Wales, Australia, the profession has willingly surrendered these rights in favour of a disciplinary system known as co-regulation or collaborative regulation, under which disciplinary processes are shared with a "lay" body, the Health Care Complaints Commission. The system constitutes a unique situation in the history of medical regulation. This article examines the origin and operations of co-regulation and comes to the conclusion that its successful operation over the last decade raises questions about whether peer review is indispensable as the basis of medical regulation. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|