首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论我国绝对权救济模式的立法选择
引用本文:丁海俊,周玉辉.论我国绝对权救济模式的立法选择[J].政法论丛,2008(3):25-31.
作者姓名:丁海俊  周玉辉
作者单位:北京航空航天大学法学院,北京,100083
摘    要:目前绝对权救济模式主要有传统大陆法系民法中绝对权请求权与损害赔偿之债的“二元模式”以及《民法通则》确立的统一侵权责任的“一元模式”。基于民事权利、义务、责任的对立统一关系以及绝对权救济模式背后的法理不同,应当变革《民法通则》统一侵权责任模式为归责原则、时效适用、责任形态各异的预防侵权责任方式与赔偿侵权责任方式相结合的“新一元模式”。

关 键 词:绝对权救济  预防型侵权责任  补偿型侵权责任
文章编号:1002-6274(2008)03-025-06

On the Legislative Choice of the Patterns of Remedy for Absolute Rights in Mainland
Ding Hai-jun,Zhou Yu-hui.On the Legislative Choice of the Patterns of Remedy for Absolute Rights in Mainland[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2008(3):25-31.
Authors:Ding Hai-jun  Zhou Yu-hui
Institution:(Law School of Beihang University, Beijing 100053)
Abstract:Nowadays there are two patterns of remedy for absolute fights, which are the Dualistic Pattern containing the right of claim of absolute rights and debt of compensation in the traditional Civil Law and uniform tortuous liability, a Unitary Pattern established in General Principle of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China. The article discusses the relationship among civil right,civil duty and civil liability in the same civil legal relationship,then analyzes the juris-prudence reasons of patterns of remedy for absolute rights in virtue of original rights and claims for remedy, and suggests establishing a New Unitary Pattern of remedy for absolute rights consisting of protective type of tortuous liability and compen- satory type of tortuous liability by reforming the Unitary Pattern established in General Principle of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China.
Keywords:remedy for absolute fight  protective type of tortuous liability  compensatory type d tortuous liability
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号