| 论《治安管理处罚法》的立法缺陷—法律人本主义研究的视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭安元.论《治安管理处罚法》的立法缺陷—法律人本主义研究的视角[J].山西警官高等专科学校学报,2008,16(4):41-46. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭安元 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东世纪华人律师事务所,广东,深圳,518081 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《治安管理处罚法》中首倡人本主义是我国法治的创新，但是在具体法律规范中演绎人本主义思想时存在缺陷和漏洞。它对保护人身权利是不够的，也与保护人身权利的精神不相符合，这主要体现在该法的第21条。同样这一问题也存在于保护财产权方面，比如该法的第11条、第89条和第102条。另外，该法还存在表达人本主义法律思想的逻辑不统一问题。条件成熟情况下，应对《治安管理处罚法》中表达人本主义思想存在缺陷的条款进行修正和完善。
|
| 关 键 词： | 治安管理处罚法 人本主义 立法缺陷 矫正和完善 |
Legislation Defect of "Penalty Law of Public Security Administration"——from the perspective of humanism of law |
| |
| GUO An-yuan.Legislation Defect of "Penalty Law of Public Security Administration"——from the perspective of humanism of law[J].Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy,2008,16(4):41-46. |
| |
| Authors: | GUO An-yuan |
| |
| Institution: | GUO An-yuan(Guangdong,ShiJi HuaRen Law Agency,Shenzhen 518081,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Humanism initiated firstly in Penalty Law of Public Security Administration is Chinese innovation of law.However there are shortcoming and defects in definition of humanism in concrete regulations.It is inadequate to protect rights of person and not matched with the spirit of protecting rights of person.The Article 21 of this law showed it.The same problem lies in the protection of property,such as Article 11,89 and 102.Additionally,the logic of expressing humanism legal thinking is not united.The articles ... |
| |
| Keywords: | Penalty Law of Public Security Administration humanism legislative defects revise and improve |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
