构建刑事追诉和法律监督相统一的中国检察权

检察学研究中的主流一元论把检察制度统一于法律监督，存在诸多无法克服的矛盾；二元论一定意义上又具有否认法律监督的倾向。而从监督和制约来透视中国检察权之争，则应超越传统的“一元”和“二元”之争。中国检察权包含法律监督和刑事追诉两大权能，法律监督和刑事追诉统一于检察权，但又在检察权下适度分离。其体现了监督和制约的内在特点，也是完善中国检察制度，优化检察机关职能配置，全面贯彻落实宪法原则和党的十七大“完善监督和制约机制”的需要。

To Build the Chinese Procuratorial Power of the Unity of Criminal Prosecution and Legal Supervision

Monism, the mainstream of the procuratorial studies, unifies the procuratorial system into legal supervision, which has considerable insurmountable contradictions. The dualism of the procuratorial studies, to some degree, has the tendency to deny the legal supervision. From the perspective of restraint and oversight, the argument of the Chinese prosecution power should go beyond the traditional monism and dualism. The main two functions of the Chinese prosecution power are the legal supervision and the criminal prosecution. These two functions are unit- ed, also rationally separate, under the prosecution power, which reveals the inner characteristic of restraint and oversight. It is also the need to improve the Chinese procuratorial system and optimize the distribution of the procuratorial organs＇ functions, along with the comprehensive implementation of the constitutional principles and improve the mechanism of restraint and oversight of the 17th CPC National Congress.