| 在自由与规制之间——两大法系自由心证主义比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘志瀛,阎惠英.在自由与规制之间——两大法系自由心证主义比较研究[J].河北法学,2007,25(2):137-141. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘志瀛 阎惠英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 山东大学,法学院,山东,济南,250100
2. 河北政法职业学院,河北,石家庄,050061 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 诉讼正义实现的基础在于案件真相的发现.就案件真相的发现模式而言,英美法系和大陆法系虽然发展历程彼此相异,但却殊途同归.前者经历了从绝对自由的证明到相对自由的证明;后者经历了从绝对不自由的证明到相对自由的证明.现代两大法系自由心证主义以自由与规制、真相发现与抑制主观随意性为最重要的特征.两大法系对自由心证的合理规制值得我们借鉴和学习.
|
| 关 键 词： | 自由心证 功能性比较 相对自由的证明 合理规制 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-3933(2007)02-0137-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年10月17 |
Between Freedom and the Regulations——The comparison study of the free proof of the two law families |
| |
| PAN Zhi-ying,YAN Hui-ying.Between Freedom and the Regulations——The comparison study of the free proof of the two law families[J].Hebei Law Science,2007,25(2):137-141. |
| |
| Authors: | PAN Zhi-ying YAN Hui-ying |
| |
| Abstract: | Truth-founding is the foundation of judicial justice.For the model of fact-founding,There has been a different history in the common law system and the continental law system,but the result has a resembled appearance.The former devel-oped from absolute free proof to relative free proof;the latter developed from stationary proof to relatively free proof.The most important character of modern free proof of the two law systems is the balance between freedom and regula-tions.The reasonable regulations for the free proof is the virtue of the two law families that we ought to learn from. |
| |
| Keywords: | free proof functional comparison relatively free proof reasonable regulations |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
