| 宪法监督模式差异性的成因分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴延溢.宪法监督模式差异性的成因分析[J].河北法学,2003,21(6):19-23. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴延溢 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南通师范学院,法政系,江苏,南通,226007 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江苏省哲学社会科学研究十五规划项目(H3-011)“人大宪法监督的理论构造与制度安排问题研究”(主持人:那述宇教授)成果之一 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 人们通常将宪法监督模式在总体上划分为四种典型的类型,即立法机关监督型、司法机关监督型、宪法委员会监督型和宪法法院监督型。不同的国家之所以要选择不同的模式,存在着诸多方面的原因,如理论基础、法律传统、历史际遇、司法体制等。对宪法监督模式差异性的成因进行多角度的考察,对我国宪法监督制度的改革有着十分重要的意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 宪法监督模式 理论基础 法律传统 历史际遇 司法体制 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-3933(2003)06-0019-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年5月6日 |
Analysis the Causes of the Differences among the Constitutional Supervision Patterns |
| |
| WU Yan-yi.Analysis the Causes of the Differences among the Constitutional Supervision Patterns[J].Hebei Law Science,2003,21(6):19-23. |
| |
| Authors: | WU Yan-yi |
| |
| Abstract: | The constitutional supervision patterns are generally divided into four typical categories. They are legislative body supervision pattern, judicial body supervision pattern, constitutional committee supervision pattern and constitutional court supervision pattern. Many elements can account for different patterns cbosen by different countries, such as theoretical background, legal tradition, historical opportunity and judicial system, etc. To review the causes of the differences among the constitutional supervision patterns from multiple sides is significant to the reform of our country s constitutional supervision system. |
| |
| Keywords: | constitutional supervision patterns theoretical background legal traditions historical opportunities judicial systems |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
