论职侦案件询问初查对象及其合理规制

询问初查对象与讯问犯罪嫌疑人有所区别．具体体现在是否具有强制性、适用的程序规则以及被调查人的身份和权利。部分检察机关通过询问初查对象即获取了被调查人的口供，并存在限制初查对象人身自由的现象，其询问活动也没有按照讯问犯罪嫌疑人的要求进行。为了询问而限制初查对象人身自由超过二十四小时属于非法羁押，通过初查询问规避法律限制性规定，则会架空《刑事诉讼法》对侦查讯问的规制。应当明确侦查机关可以传唤初查对象到案接受询问，但不得超过十二小时，询问初查对象所获材料不能作为被告人供述使用．如果询问初查对象过程中存在应当排除所获供述的非法取供行为．侦查机关之后讯问所获得的口供也应当排除。

Questioning the Object under Preliminary Investigation and Its Regulations

Questioning the object under preliminary investigation is different from interrogating the suspect in three aspects： coerciveness, regulation and the right of the investigated person. Some procuratorates obtain confession of the investigated person by questioning him in preliminary investigation. The freedom of the investigated person is limited in the questioning process which does not comply with regulations of interrogating the suspect. Limiting the freedom of the investigated person beyond 24 hours is illegal detention. Questioning the object under preliminary investigation becomes a measure to avoid regulations of interrogation. The investigator should be authorized to summon the object under preliminary investigation to questioning him, but the length of summon should be limited to 12 hours. Confession obtained in questioning the object under preliminaryinvestigation can not be used as evidence against him in trial. If the illegal measuresforbidden by law are used in questioning the object under preliminary investigation, the confession obtained in successive interrogation should also be excluded.