首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

同行评议与发表:对法律工作者的启迪
引用本文:[美]Susan,Haack,王进喜.同行评议与发表:对法律工作者的启迪[J].证据科学,2014(1):40-55.
作者姓名:[美]Susan  Haack  王进喜
作者单位:[1] 美国迈阿密大学 [2]中国政法大学证据科学研究院
摘    要:在确定某理论或者技术是否属于科学知识,从而有助于事实审判者时,该理论或者技术是否通过了同行评议并发表是一个重要的考量因素。本文讨论了同行评议的起源、在科学和医学期刊建设中的现行角色、出版前同行评议的基本理论,以及同行评议作为质量控制机制的固有的局限性。

关 键 词:同行评议  发表  科学知识

Peer Review and Publication:Lessons for Lawyers
Institution:Susan Haack, Wang Jinxi( Institute of Evidence Law and Forensic Science, CUPL.)
Abstract:pertinent consideration in determining whether a theory or technique is scientiifc knowledge that will assist the trier of fact] is whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review and publication. This paper discussed the origins of this practice, the ragged process by which it gradually became standard atscientiifc and medical journals, and the many roles it now plays;therationale for pre-publication peer review, and the inherent limitations of the system as a quality-control mechanism.
Keywords:Peer review  Publication  Scientiifc knowledge
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号