"和"与"争":中西传统法治价值选择之异 |
| |
引用本文: | 张宇."和"与"争":中西传统法治价值选择之异[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2007(6):18-21. |
| |
作者姓名: | 张宇 |
| |
作者单位: | 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院,哈尔滨,150080 |
| |
摘 要: | "和"与"争"分别是中西方法治价值选择的基点,不同价值基点的认可,使中西方做出了不同的价值选择.中国传统法重"德治"、"民本"、"无讼"、"等级有序",而西方传统法注重"法治"、"人本"、"正义"以及"人人平等",这最终促使中西方形成了迥然不同的法律文化,并走上了两条不同的法治发展之路.
|
关 键 词: | 和 争 法律价值 中西方 传统法治 价值选择 Harmonious Western Value Traditional Choice 法治发展 法律文化 正义 有序 无讼 民本 德治 中国 价值基点 西方法治 |
文章编号: | 1008-7966(2007)06-0018-04 |
修稿时间: | 2007年9月22日 |
"Harmonious" and "Struggling": A Different Choice of Traditional Nomocracy Value Between China and the Western |
| |
Authors: | ZHANG Yu |
| |
Abstract: | "Harmonious"and"Struggling"is respectively the basic point of choice of Chinese-Western nomocracy value,the different basic point caused the different value choices:Chinese traditional law attached importance to"ruled by virtue","people-rooted","naught-dispute","rank order";while western tradi- tional law paid attention to"ruled by law","human-rooted","justice"as well as"equality",this finally urged the western and Chinese formed the totally different legal culture,and stepped onto two different road of ruled by law. |
| |
Keywords: | harmonious struggling legal value |
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|