首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The British general election of 2010 under different voting rules
Authors:Paul R Abramson  John H Aldrich  Abraham Diskin  Aaron M Houck  Renan Levine  Thomas J Scotto
Institution:1. Michigan State University, United States;2. Duke University, Department of Political Science, Box 90204, Durham, NC 27708-0204, United States;3. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel;4. The Interdisciplinary Center, Herzlyia, Israel;5. Duke University, United States;6. University of Toronto-Scarborough, Canada;g University of Essex, United Kingdom
Abstract:The 2010 British election resulted in what the British refer to as a “hung Parliament” for the first time in over a generation. This result further heightened the debate over the fairness and utility of the nation’s centuries-old first-past-the-post (FPTP) system. Survey data are used to simulate the election outcome under four different electoral systems beyond FPTP: round-robin pair-wise comparisons, the Borda count, the alternative vote, and Coombs' method. Results suggest that in 2010, the Liberal-Democrats were Condorcet preferred to all other parties and would have won a national election under every tested method except the alternative vote, the method supported by the Liberal-Democrats during the referendum in May 2011 and, of course, FPTP as actually used.
Keywords:Electoral systems  United Kingdom  Alternative vote  Borda count  Condorcet method  Coombs' method
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号