首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《史记》三"书"评议
引用本文:安东.《史记》三"书"评议[J].浙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2005(1):65-68.
作者姓名:安东
作者单位:安东(北京出版社出版集团,北京 100011)
摘    要:<史记>篇目问题较多,而又以"八书"为甚.学界虽然对"八书"总体的看法没有什么分歧,但有三点需要注意:其一是<史记>缺少<礼书>、<乐书>和<兵书>,八篇中就有三篇有问题;其二是对<太史公自序>的几句话该怎么理解,<律书>和<兵书>的关系应是怎样的;其三是在司马迁创作"八书"的大前提下,上述三篇中是否还有后人搀入的部分.

关 键 词:<史记>  <礼书>  <乐书>  <律书>
文章编号:1009-1505(2005)01-0065-04
修稿时间:2005年1月3日

A Review of Three Books about The Record of History
AN Dong.A Review of Three Books about The Record of History[J].Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University,2005(1):65-68.
Authors:AN Dong
Abstract:There are many problems for the articles in The Record of History,especially more problems for Eight Books.Despite few different general ideas on the Eight Books in the academic field,there are three aspects deserving discussion.First,there are no Book on Rituals,Book On Music,and Book on Military in The Record of History,i.e.,three of the Eight Books are problematic.Second,how do people understand the several sentences in the Taishigong's auto-preface,and what is the relationship between the Book on Law and Book on Military?Thirdly,under the premise of Si Maqian writing the Eight Books,are some parts of the Three Books mentioned above added by other people in the later times?
Keywords:The Record of History  Book on Rituals  Book On Music  Book on Military
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号