论刑民交叉案件的程序处理

在刑民交叉案件的程序处理顺序上，无论是“先刑后民”“先民后刑”还是“刑民并行” ，均是一种既定的程序处理模式，省思当下刑民交叉案件的司法现状，其程序处理应当立足于更深层次的因素。从分类上来看，传统的界定标准与类型划分存在一定瑕疵，类型化的程序处理机制只是一种表象适配，以案件事实为中心的界定与分类才更为妥善。在此前提下，较为妥当地处理刑民交叉程序冲突的进路应当坚持以前置关系判断为主、利益保护判断为辅的原则。优先判断是否存在前置关系，存在时适用“先刑后民”或“先民后刑” ，不存在时适用“刑民并行” 。同时，以利益保护作为辅助性原则，重点考量依据前置关系判断的程序适用是否对涉案人或单位造成较大的不利影响，如具有利益保护的重要性，应重新判断程序适用模式。贯彻层次性的理念，也能为刑民交叉案件中较为疑难的程序问题提供解决思路，诸如生效裁判既判力、证据交叉适用、涉案款物的处理等。

On the Procedural Handling of Criminal & Civil Cases

In terms of the handling order in criminal & civil cases, whether it is “criminal before civil”, “criminal after civil” or “criminal and civil parallel”, it is an established procedure. To investigate the current judicial situation of criminal & civil cases, its handling procedure should be based on deeper-level factors. From the substantive level, there are some defects in the traditional standard of definition and classification. The typed procedural mechanism is just a kind of representation adaptation, and the definition and classification centered on the facts of the case is more appropriate. On this premise, the more appropriate way to deal with the conflict of criminal & civil cross-procedure should be the adherence to the principle of pre-relationship judgment as the main and interest protection judgment as the auxiliary. Priority should be given to judge whether there is a prepositional relationship. When it exists, “criminal before civil” or “criminal after civil” should be applied. When it does not exist, “criminal and civil parallel” should be applied. At the same time, taking the protection of interests as the auxiliary principle, we should focus on whether the application of the procedure judged according to the prepositional relationship has a greater adverse impact on the person or unit involved. If it is important to protect the interests, we should re-judge the application mode of the procedure. The implementation of the concept of order can also provide solutions to the more difficult procedural problems in criminal & civil cases, such as effective judgment of res judicata, the cross application of evidence, the handling of money and property involved in the case.