低值可回收物补贴参照垃圾处置费“一刀切”合适吗？——基于上海的验证

大多数城市对低值可回收物的补贴标准是参照垃圾处置费“一刀切”执行，但这对企业是否补贴到位、对政府是否最节约尚有待探究。通过构建企业成本与政府节约综合选择法（BC GE选择法），以上海为例进行实证检验发现，在不影响现行补贴政策所对应的低值可回收物回收率前提下，与参照生活垃圾处置费用221元每吨的“一刀切”式补贴方式相比，按BC GE选择法核算形成的梯度补贴标准执行可节省7307.8万元。应改变“一刀切”式补贴做法，实行梯度补贴政策；建立低值可回收物补贴核算系统，对企业精准补贴；各地可立足自身财力或垃圾分类目标等实际，按低值可回收物补贴敏感度制定梯度补贴标准，促进低值可回收物回收、推动行业产业化发展。

Is The “ One Size Fits All ” Subsidy Standard Based on Waste Disposal Fee Suitable for the Low Value Recyclable Waste?——Testing from Shanghai

At present, most cities take the disposal fee as a “one size fits all” standard, regardless of whether this subsidy is benefit to enterprises and saving for the government. With given an comprehensive selection method (BC-GE selection method) and take Shanghai as an example find that, compared to the “one size fits all” standard, Shanghai can save 73.078 million under the gradient subsidy standard which calculated by BC-GE selection method, with no influence on the recovery rate of the low value recyclable waste.In order to benefit to enterprises and saving for the government, we should change the “one size fits all” subsidy which according to standard into gradient subsidy standard, establish the low value recyclable waste accounting system to subsidize enterprises accurately, establish gradient subsidy standards based on the sensitivity of low value recyclable waste the financial resources or waste classification objectives for different areas or times is benefit to promote the recovery of the low value recyclable waste and its industrial development.