我国违法所得没收程序的若干检讨——基于2012年《刑事诉讼法》相关规定的分析

2012年《刑事诉讼法》规定的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人逃匿、死亡案件违法所得没收程序对于解决我国实践中存在的问题具有重要意义，但也存在一些需要进一步探讨的问题。在适用范围方面，立法从案件性质与逃匿时间两方面加以限制，实无必要性。在案件证明方面，应当在检察机关与利害关系人之间合理分配举证责任，明确相应的证明标准。为保证没收裁判具有可执行性，应当建立体系性的财产保全措施。

Some Comments on the Criminla Proceeds Forfeiture Procedure in China——An Analysis Based on Some Related Provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China(2012)

Although the Forfeiture Procedure of Criminals’ Illegal Proceeds which prescribed in the Amendment of Criminal Procedure Law Of The People’s Republic Of China has much significance in settling the practical problems in China, there are some problems need to be discussed. It is unnecessary for the legislature to limit the scope in which the procedure apply with the graveness of the crime and the term of abscond. The legislature should have rationally allocate the burden of proof between the procurator and the claimer and define the standard of proof. For the sake of the enforceability of the forfeiture judgment, a systematic protective measures of property is necessary.