首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论完善我国行政赔偿归责原则
引用本文:曹海青,周倩,李玉娥.论完善我国行政赔偿归责原则[J].河南公安高等专科学校学报,2009(4):92-95.
作者姓名:曹海青  周倩  李玉娥
作者单位:中央司法警官学院,河北保定071000
摘    要:我国行政赔偿归责原则是违法原则。违法原则存在三方面缺陷:限制行政赔偿范围;不能解决公有公共设施致害引起的行政赔偿问题;难以解决共同侵权、混合过错等情况下的责任分担问题。为了更好地维护行政相对人的合法权益,我国行政赔偿应主要采用客观过错原则,并把无过错责任原则作为辅助原则。

关 键 词:行政赔偿  归责原则  违法原则  客观过错原则  无过错责任原则

On Perfecting the Criterion of Administrative Compensation Liability of China
CAO Hai-qing,ZHOU Qian,LI Yu-e.On Perfecting the Criterion of Administrative Compensation Liability of China[J].Journal of Henan Public Security Academy,2009(4):92-95.
Authors:CAO Hai-qing  ZHOU Qian  LI Yu-e
Institution:(Central Institute of Correction Police, Baoding Hebei China 071000)
Abstract:The criterion of administrative compensation liability of China is transgression criterion of liability. The transgression criterion of liability has three flaws: restricts the extent of administrative compensation; can't solve the administrative compensation problem caused by the harm which is caused by public-owned common establishments; hardly shares responsibility on the situation of common tort and blend fault. In order to defend the legal rights and interests of administrative relative person in a more effective way, the administrative compensation of China should mainly adopt objective fault criterion of liability and the non-fauh criterion of liability should be established only as a supplementary criterion.
Keywords:Administrative compensation  Criterion of liability  Transgression criterion of liability  Objective fault criterion of liability  Non-fault criterion liability
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号