首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

证据属性之判断——比较法与法学方法论的启示
引用本文:肖建华.证据属性之判断——比较法与法学方法论的启示[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2006(2):27-36.
作者姓名:肖建华
作者单位:中国政法大学,诉讼法研究中心,北京,100088
摘    要:证据属性的“三性(客观性、关联性和合法性)”是中国证据法的话语中心之一。但是,从程序制度的建构和法学方法论上分析,证据认定的客观化要求证据的关联性构成证据的基本属性。程序的目标之一就是扫清这些真假证据造成的迷雾而达致认识案件真实,所以,进入程序中的诉讼证据可以不是客观的;合法性要求也无法成为证据普适性的属性,它只是表明成文法之方法论意义上间接地与证据属性问题建立意义上的连接。

关 键 词:诉讼  证据  关联性  案件真实

Judgement on Evidence Attribute--Enlightenment on comparative law and law methodology
XIAO Jian-hua.Judgement on Evidence Attribute--Enlightenment on comparative law and law methodology[J].Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute,2006(2):27-36.
Authors:XIAO Jian-hua
Abstract:The "three attribute"(objectivity, relevancy and validity) of the evidence is one of the language centres of Chinese Evidence Law. But analyzing from the building of the procedure system and the law methodology, the objectivity of evidence cognizance demands that the relevancy should be the basic attribute. One of the aims of procedure is to eliminate the confusion of the true and false evidences to realize the case reality. Therefore, the litigation evidence in the proceeding may be not objective, and the validity requirement cannot be the nature of pervasive application, and it only indicates that in the meaning of methodology of statute law, it indirectly develops juncture of meaning with the problem of evidence attribute.
Keywords:litigation  evidence  relevancy  case reality
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号