首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

质疑侵权法独立于债法
引用本文:廖焕国.质疑侵权法独立于债法[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2006(6):49-53.
作者姓名:廖焕国
作者单位:暨南大学,法学院,广东,广州,510632
摘    要:侵权行为是债因之一,侵权法应为债法的组成部分。历史上债非因契约而生,而是私犯的必然结果。债的本质是责任,责任的内容是债,二者没有根本性区别。侵权责任形式主要为损害赔偿。将侵权法脱离债法并设立单独的民事责任法之主张难以成立。

关 键 词:侵权法  债法  独立

Tort Law:Separates from Obligation Law or Not?
LIAO Huan-guo.Tort Law:Separates from Obligation Law or Not?[J].Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute,2006(6):49-53.
Authors:LIAO Huan-guo
Abstract:Tort is one of reasons leading to obligations and the law of torts is part of law of obligations.The concept of obligation comes from delictum,not from contract.The essence of obligation is liability, and the obligation's content is obligation,there is no difference between them in nature.Compensation for the damage is the mainly way to bear the liability. So,the legislative argumentation that the torts law can separate from obligations law and establish the civil liability by itself is not acceptable.
Keywords:tort law  obligation law  separation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号