首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论行政调查取证行为之合法性控制——兼评上海市闵行区的所谓“钓鱼执法”案件
引用本文:周刚志.论行政调查取证行为之合法性控制——兼评上海市闵行区的所谓“钓鱼执法”案件[J].江苏行政学院学报,2010(2).
作者姓名:周刚志
作者单位:厦门大学法学院,厦门,361005
摘    要:行政调查取证行为须受职权法定原则与比例原则之拘束。在行政复议与行政审判过程中,复议机关与人民法院可以依据非法证据排除规则与证据自由心证规则对行政机关所收集的证据进行合法性审查与证明效力判断,以保证具体行政行为的合法性。为杜绝诱导型调查行为的泛滥,我国可以通过行政程序制度、行政证据制度与政府财政制度的相关改革,构建遏制行政调查权力滥用的行政法制度。

关 键 词:诱导型调查  职权法定原则  比例原则  

On Legal Control of Administrative Investigation Act——Also commenting on the so-called "law enforcement on bait" in Minhang District, Shanghai
ZHOU Gang-zhi.On Legal Control of Administrative Investigation Act——Also commenting on the so-called "law enforcement on bait" in Minhang District, Shanghai[J].The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute,2010(2).
Authors:ZHOU Gang-zhi
Institution:Law School of Xiamen University/a>;Xiamen 361005/a>;China
Abstract:The administrative investigation act should be constrained by the principle of proportionality and delegation with necessity. The administrative reconsideration authority and the people's court shall make judgments according to exclusionary rule of illegally obtained evidence and doctrine of free evaluation of evidence, so they shall examine to determine whether or not the specific administrative act is legal. The inducible administrative investigation could be abused, and we can construct the administrativ...
Keywords:Inducible Administrative Investigation  Principle of Delegation with Necessity  Principle of Proportionality  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号