首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“赔钱赎刑”正当性与合法性的追问与考察
引用本文:关今华,关山虹,吴强.“赔钱赎刑”正当性与合法性的追问与考察[J].福建公安高等专科学校学报,2008,22(2):85-92.
作者姓名:关今华  关山虹  吴强
作者单位:福建师范大学 福建福州350108(关今华,关山虹),莆田市涵江区人民法院 福建莆田351111(吴强)
摘    要:"赔钱赎刑"是司法和谐的表现,应从司法和谐理念出发,运用思辨的方法,以实证为视角,对"赔钱赎刑"进行"三追问"与"二考察";进而得出其符合司法和谐正当性与合法性的理由是:人权保障理念对当事人双重保护的趋同;人类社会文明进步促进刑罚轻缓化的实行;与修复性司法的国际接轨视野的催动;体现出一般公正下的个别公正的刑罚个别化的追求,以及在司法和谐技术上对法律潜在的认同。并对司法和谐的"赔钱赎刑"制度在中国本土化过程中的转化和现实的具体构建进行了技术性考察。

关 键 词:司法和谐  “赔钱赎刑”  正当性  合法性
修稿时间:2007年12月3日

On the Justification and Legitimacy of "Indemnity for Penalty"
GUAN Jin-hua,GUAN Shan-hong,WU Qiang.On the Justification and Legitimacy of "Indemnity for Penalty"[J].The Study of Social Public Security,2008,22(2):85-92.
Authors:GUAN Jin-hua  GUAN Shan-hong  WU Qiang
Institution:GUAN Jin-hua1,GUAN Shan-hong1,WU Qiang2
Abstract:The system of "indemnity for penalty" is in accordance with the conception of judicial harmony. From the concept of judicial harmony,and using the method of reflection,the author of the essay investigated and questioned the system of "indemnity for penalty". The author concluded that the following facts justified and legalized the system of "indemnity for penalty": the protection of the human rights of both parties; the commutation of penalty driven by the progress of human civilization; the coordination of international judiciary; the pursuit of individualized penalty on the premise of fair justice; and the potential recognition of judicial harmony. At the same time,the author made a technical investigation of the transformation of "indemnity for penalty" system in present China and its realistic concrete construction.
Keywords:judicial harmony  "indemnity for penalty"  justification  legitimacy
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号