| 台湾地区的刑事卷宗制度及其借鉴意义 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李长城.台湾地区的刑事卷宗制度及其借鉴意义[J].福建公安高等专科学校学报,2012(5):55-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李长城 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文是笔者主持的教育部人文社科青年项目“中国刑事卷宗制度研究”（11XJC820051）的阶段性成果. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 台湾地区通过审前程序中的权力制约和权利保障来保障卷宗信息的全面、可靠。传闻证据规则的确立和庭审中心的奉行,有效地保障了被告的诘问权和实体真实的发现。台湾刑事卷宗制度的借鉴意义在于:刑事卷宗制度不能废除;应当在四个方面对大陆的刑事卷宗制度进行正当化改造。
|
| 关 键 词： | 台湾刑事卷宗 制衡 质证权 借鉴 |
Research and Reference on Criminal Dossier System in Taiwan |
| |
| LI Chang-cheng.Research and Reference on Criminal Dossier System in Taiwan[J].The Study of Social Public Security,2012(5):55-60. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Chang-cheng |
| |
| Institution: | LI Chang-cheng (School of Law, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China ) |
| |
| Abstract: | Taiwan guarantees thorough and trustworthy dossier information by the right restriction and the right security in pretrial procedures. The establishment of the hearsay rules and the performance of the trial center doctrine can effectively guarantee the right to cross examination of the accused and the true finding of an entity. It is a good reference that the criminal dossier system can＇t be abolished and that it should be reformed by four mainly ways for the relative systems of the Chinese Mainland. |
| |
| Keywords: | Taiwan the criminal dossier system checks and balances right to examine reference |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
