对刑法总则中两款规定的看法——析《刑法》第14条第2款和第15条第2款的存改废之争

对于《刑法》第14条第2款和第15条第2款的合理性问题,学界存在存改废之争。然这三种观点都不能完满地协调该两款规定所蕴含的罪刑法定原则、犯罪与刑事责任同在原理以及刑法"以处罚故意行为为原则、以处罚过失行为为例外"三者之间的关系。在保留前款规定的基础上,将后款修正为"过失实施的危害社会行为,法律规定为犯罪的,应当负刑事责任",不失为合理的立法选择。

The View on the Two Articles of General Provisions of Criminal Law -- Analysis on the Controversy of Abolition,Conservation and Modification on the Second Article of Fourteenth Item and the Second Article of Fifteenth Item of the Criminal Law

For reasonableness of the criminal law fourteenth paragraphs two and fifteenth of paragraph two,the academia holds three kinds of viewpoints whether to conserve,modify or abolish. But those views cannot coordinate perfectly relationship among the legal principle of crime and punishment, crime and crim- inal responsibility in criminal law implied in provisions of the two articles, the principles and＂punishment of intentional behavior as the principle while punishment of negligent acts as the exception＇in criminal law. In the retention of the criminal law fourteenth paragraph two on the basis of the fifteenth paragraph two cor- rection for＂negligent behaviour that does harm to the social shall bear criminal responsibility if the law considers it as a crime. ＂It should be a rational choice in legislation.