首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论鉴定结论冲突
引用本文:邹积超.论鉴定结论冲突[J].福建公安高等专科学校学报,2004,18(6):46-50.
作者姓名:邹积超
作者单位:华东政法学院 上海200042
摘    要:鉴定结论冲突是指鉴定结论之间存在不一致性 ,相互对立排斥或者相互干扰。鉴定结论的冲突从某种程度上影响了诉讼的正常进行 ,但考察其机理 ,又存在着某种必然性 ,是一种多元因素的产物。因此 ,对待鉴定结论冲突应该本着多元考虑的原则 ,冷静对待 ,通过规范法官的心证 ,制定相应的证明责任规则来规范 ,而不能简单的预定效力。同时应该针对其机理 ,采取必要的预防措施 ,避免其对诉讼的不良影响。

关 键 词:鉴定结论  冲突  鉴定改革  自由心证
文章编号:1008-6048(2004)06-0046-05
修稿时间:2004年9月16日

On Conflicts of Determinative Conclusions
ZOU Ji-chao.On Conflicts of Determinative Conclusions[J].The Study of Social Public Security,2004,18(6):46-50.
Authors:ZOU Ji-chao
Abstract:The conflicts of determinative conclusions refer to the differences, mutual opposites and exclusion, or interference. They influence the proper order of suitcases in some respects. When we check on its mechanism, we come to realize that there exits a certain inevitability and it is a product with multi-factors. Therefore, when treating the conflicts of determinative conclusions, we should base on the principle of many-sided consideration, manage them coolly, formulate relevant proving responsibility regulations by regulating the judge's mental proofs instead of simply predetermine the effects. Meanwhile, we should carry out necessary precautionary countermeasures by targeting at its mechanism in order to avoid its negative influences over suitcases.
Keywords:determinative conclusion  conflict  determinative reform  arbitrary mental proof
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号