论《道路交通安全法》第76条无过错责任之合理性

《道路交通安全法》第76条之规定被解读为“机动车负全责”,从而成为社会讨论的的焦点问题。该第76条中规定了两个无过错责任,即保险公司的无过错责任以及机动车对行人、非机动车的无过错责任。分析得出,保险公司承担无过错责任,是与保险分散社会风险的原理分不开;机动车损伤行人、非机动车后,对保险赔偿剩余的部分,由机动车方承担相对的无过错责任,同时规定可以就受害人的过失进行相抵。具合理性。

On No - Fault Liability's Reasonableness in Article 76 of Traffic Security Law

Article 76 of Traffic Security Law becomes a social focus to be discussed because it is usually explained that the vehicles have to take full responsibility in an accident.The article includes two no-fault liabilities.That is,the insurance company and vehicle should take no-fault liability.The insurance takes the liability based on the principle which risks can be decentralized by insurance.Meanwhile,vehicle will have to take no-fault liability and pay the injured human beings or the damaged non-vehicles.Moreover,the article is fair because it also stipulates that no-fault liability the vehicle should take can be offset in accordance with the fault of the victim.