羁押视角下的刑事一审审限制度改革

审限问题，既传统又现代，既有中国特色又有比较法视角。传统是因为审限制度可上溯至唐代，而经过历史大浪淘沙至今仍然存在于我国刑事诉讼法当中可表明其具有现代性。纵览其他国家刑事诉讼法，虽鲜有规定审限制度的，但却存在与我国审限制度功能相类似的快速审理制度。近年来，由于超期羁押和刑事审判压力双重作用，刑事一审审限制度的存废问题再次引起学界关注，理论和实证研究成果不断涌现，但保留论者和废除论者各执一词，不相上下。但综观研究成果，均将审限制度的研究局限在法院审理阶段，没有从刑事诉讼的整体出发推动审限制度的改革。本文从刑事诉讼的价值选择和刑事诉讼各机关的权力配置出发，以羁押为视角，分四部分进行讨论。第一部分指出刑事一审审限制度改革迫在眉睫；第二部分指出羁押的存在使刑事一审审限的存在成为必要；第三部分介绍当前相关改革建议并加以分析；最后提出刑事诉讼整体结构下的刑事一审审限制度改革建议。

The Improvement of Trail Time Limit of the First Instance from the View of Detention

the trail time limit is a question all the time in and abroad.The trail time limit was regulated in the law of tang dy-nasty and exists in the criminal procedure law.The trail time limit is not regulated in the other countries,but the similar system such as speed trail is existed.In recent years,under the double influence of overdue detention and trail pressure,the trail time limit problem becomes the reach focus.With a lot of theoretical and practical reach,there are two points,one is abolishing,the other is retaining.But making a comprehensive survey,the reach about trail time limit locates in the trail period,not from the entirety of the criminal procedure.This article discusses the problem from the view of detention in four parts.The first part finds out that the improvement of trail time limit is so urgent,in the second part,we analyze that the existence of detention make the trail time limit necessary.The third part present some advises of recommendation and analyse them.Then this article proposes the improvement advice from the entirety of the criminal procedure system.