| 从判决释理谈我国民事替代性纠纷解决机制的重构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张慧清.从判决释理谈我国民事替代性纠纷解决机制的重构[J].贵州警官职业学院学报,2007,19(2):42-45. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张慧清 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 佛山科学技术学院,政法学院,广东,佛山,528000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | ADR强调通过当事人合意解决纠纷，而司法程序通过强制性权威解决纠纷。由于私法领域中纠纷当事人具备法律上地位的平等性和处分权．强调通过合意而解决纠纷并进而促进当事人自治的ADR在法理上和实践中都得到了广泛支持。以此为鉴，重构我国民事替代性纠纷解决机制势在必行。
|
| 关 键 词： | 判决释理 纠纷解决机制 替代性纠纷解决机制 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-5195(2007)02-0042-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年12月20 |
Reconstructing China's ADR from Interpretation of Judicial Decisions |
| |
| ZHANG Hui-qing.Reconstructing China''''s ADR from Interpretation of Judicial Decisions[J].Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College,2007,19(2):42-45. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Hui-qing |
| |
| Institution: | ZHANG Hui-qing (law and Political School, Foshan Univensity of Science and Technology, Foshan 528000, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | ADR emphasizes on resolving disputes via parties' consensus, while judicial procedures resolve disputes via compulsory authority. Due to the dispute parties' equal legal status and disposition rights in the domain of private law, ADR, which lays stress on solving disputes via parties' consensus and self-settling has been supported theoretically and practically. So, the reconstruction on China's ADR should be carried on further. |
| |
| Keywords: | interpretation of judicial decision dispute resolution alternative dispute resolution |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
