诉讼诈骗再思考

诉讼诈骗行为侵犯了他人的财产权，其法益侵害性与二者间的诈骗并无不同。诉讼诈骗行为虽然也扰乱了司法活动的正常进行．但在民事审判活动中提供虚假证据的行为刑法并不处罚，不能说诉讼诈骗行为所侵犯的法益是司法秩序。当事人提供虚假证据的行为，就是诈骗的实行行为，法官根据当事人提出的虚假证据做出错误判决，并根据判决转移被害人的财产，完全是受欺骗的结果，将诉讼诈骗行为认定为诈骗罪完全符合诈骗罪的构成要件。并不违背罪刑法定原则。

Another Look on Suit Fraud

Suit fraud violates the property rights of others, thus its harmfulness to legal interest is the same as that of ordinary fraud. Although suit fraud disturbs judiciary order, criminal law dose not punish behaviors such as providing false evidence in civil suit, therefore the legal interests infringed by suit fraud is not the judiciary order. The party＇s providing false evidence is the act of perpetrating of crime of fraud, while the incorrect judgment made by judges based on the false evidence and the consequent transfer of property is the result of fraud. Thus, behaviors of suit fraud conform to the conditions of legal responsibility, and can be considered as a type of crime of fraud.