垄断行为判定规则的沿革与内涵

我国《反垄断法》草案几经易稿已接近立法审议阶段,国内学界应加强对垄断行为判定规则的研究,才能满足未来司法实践的迫切需求。通过历史回溯和比较分析可知,在判定某行为是否构成垄断时,合理规则根据行为后果的多种因素考量,本身违法规则根据行为的特定类型作出直接判定。该套规则是适应反垄断司法资源有限性与案件事实复杂性这一基本矛盾的产物,二者的适用范围随着人们对垄断行为特性认识的深入而彼涨此消。

The Evolution and Connotation of the Antitrust Violation Judgment Rules

PRC's draft of the Antitrust Act has been revised for several times and is now on its access to legislation.For the sake of future judicial practice,domestic scholars are required eagerly to research deeply on the antitrust violation judgment rules.On the basis of historical review and comparative analysis,when judging whether a given behavior constitutes antitrust violation or not,the Rule of Reason adopts comprehensive study on the consequences while the Persecution Rule classifies the feature of said act and then gives direct outcome.This set of rules is created to tackle with the basic confliction between the limitation of judicial resources and complexity of merits in antitrust cases.The applicability of the two rules may change with the deepening recognition of the characteristics of monopolistic action.