| 同时犯理论的困惑及补救 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈洪兵,杜文俊.同时犯理论的困惑及补救[J].天津市政法管理干部学院学报,2006,22(1):14-17. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈洪兵 杜文俊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 宁波大学法学院 浙江宁波315211(陈洪兵)，上海社会科学院法学所 上海200020(杜文俊) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 能够运用部分犯罪共同说和过失共同正犯理论予以解决的问题,无须作为同时犯处理。同时犯各方的民事责任问题,根据民法上的共同侵权行为和共同危险行为理论,承担连带责任应不成问题。刑事责任问题,基本上可以运用刑事证据规则上的推定理论,谨慎地加以解决。
|
| 关 键 词： | 同时犯 民事责任 刑事责任 推定 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8393(2006)01-0014-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年8月21日 |
Perplexity and Remedy of the Coincident Principals |
| |
| CHEN Hong-bing,DU Wen-jun.Perplexity and Remedy of the Coincident Principals[J].Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law,2006,22(1):14-17. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Hong-bing DU Wen-jun |
| |
| Abstract: | We do not need to take issues as the coincident principals if they can be solved by utilizing the theory of partly crime within common crime and the theory of non-criminal unpremeditated joint crime.According to the torts of conspiracy and the joint dangerous activity in civil law,the coincident principals should undertake joint liability;for their criminal liability,we can apply the presumption theory of criminal evidence system to solve it. |
| |
| Keywords: | coincident principals civil liability criminal liability presumption |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
