首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

完善刑事证据规则的思考
引用本文:刘文成,丛华.完善刑事证据规则的思考[J].天津市政法管理干部学院学报,2009,25(4):13-17.
作者姓名:刘文成  丛华
作者单位:[1]天津公安警官职业学院教育科研处,天津300382 [2]中国人民公安大学研究生部,北京100038
摘    要:刑事证据规则具有司法功能,我国目前的刑事证据规则缺乏证据规则体系,缺少证据资格限制,规定比较粗疏,有的规定甚至互相抵触。从传闻证据规则、非法证据排除规则、口供补强规则、禁止诱导性询问规则与证据开示规则等方面探讨了完善我国刑事证据规则的方法。

关 键 词:刑事证据规则  完善  传闻证据  非法证据排除  口供补强

Thought about Improving Rules of Criminal Evidence
LIU Wen-cheng,CONG Hua.Thought about Improving Rules of Criminal Evidence[J].Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law,2009,25(4):13-17.
Authors:LIU Wen-cheng  CONG Hua
Institution:1.Department of Education and Research ,Tianjin Public Police Professional College, Tianjin 300382, China; 2.Department of Graduated Student, Chinese People s Public Security University, Beijing 100038, China)
Abstract:The authors sum up the judicial function of criminal evidence and analyze the present situation of domestic rules of criminal evidence. That is absence of the system construction of criminal evidence, lack of the limit to evidential qualification, imprecise rules and inter-contradiction of some rules, and so on. In the article they explain some principles on improving rules of criminal evidence, such as: pattern of litigation suited to our law, making up deficiencies in proof, achieving maximum benefit in litigation. They discuss the key points and measures to improve rules of criminal evidence, including rule of hearsay evidence, rule of eliminating illegal evidence, rule of confession-supplied-strong, rule of prohibiting inductive inquiry and system of criminal evidence discovery.
Keywords:rules of criminal evidence  hnproving  rule of Hearsay evidence  rules of eliminating illegal evidence  rule of confession-supplied-strong
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号