中日行政调查中强制权运用之比较研究 |
| |
引用本文: | 刘善春,赵寒宇.中日行政调查中强制权运用之比较研究[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2009(5). |
| |
作者姓名: | 刘善春 赵寒宇 |
| |
作者单位: | 中国政法大学法学院,北京,100088 |
| |
摘 要: | 行政调查中最突出的一对矛盾就是行政机关获取信息的权力与公民自由权、隐私权、财产权等权利之间的关系,所以行政调查中强制力之运用成为了一个备受关注的问题。在日本的行政强制体系中,因为缺少类似于中国"行政强制措施"的类型化概念来概括在行政实体决定作出之前、以程序性义务为前提而实施行政强制行为,故而有必要将行政调查的概念独立出来,而我国行政强制措施的概念经过理论上的厘清改造,完全可以容纳行政调查中强制权的运用。日本行政调查中的强制权运用无论在事前、事中还是事后,都有着更加明确完善的程序保障,这些是值得我国去学习和借鉴的。
|
关 键 词: | 行政调查 强制权 比较研究 |
A Comparative Study on the Coercion in Administrative Investigation of China and Japan |
| |
Authors: | LIU Shan-chun ZHAO Han-yu |
| |
Institution: | LIU Shan-chun; ZHAO Han-yu; |
| |
Abstract: | The power for information of government and the protection of civil rights,that is the principal contradiction in administrative investigation,so the coercion in administrative investigation become a focus problem.There is not a concept in the system of administrative coercion in Japan,which is similar to the concept of "administrative coercive measure"that is a kind of coercion for the obligation in the administrative process,therefore,administrative investigation is a special concept.But it is possible fo... |
| |
Keywords: | Administrative Investigation Coercion Comparative Study |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|