“道”与“自在之物”哲学思想比较 |
| |
引用本文: | 赵异.“道”与“自在之物”哲学思想比较[J].中共贵州省委党校学报,2013(2):116-118. |
| |
作者姓名: | 赵异 |
| |
作者单位: | 延边州委党校,吉林延吉,133000 |
| |
摘 要: | 《老子》和《纯粹理性评判》分别从感性认识和纯粹知性认识角度描述它们的“道”和“自在之物”。康德坚执现象与“自在之物”的根本区别,走向了二元论;《老子》借助生存哲学走向了“道”与万物的混沌统一。实践唯物主义,一方面,肯定生活实践改变世界、创造历史的伟大作用,男方面,也充分肯定在一定意义上认识活动具有相对的自在性、独立性价值,主张保持实践活动与认识活动必要的距离、张力。
|
关 键 词: | 道 自在之物 张力 |
A Comparison about "Tao" and " Thing-in-Itself " Philosophy Thought |
| |
Authors: | Zhao Yi |
| |
Institution: | Zhao Yi (Yanbian Party School, Yanji, Jilin 133000) |
| |
Abstract: | "Laozi" and "Pure rational judgment" separately describe "Tao" and "thing - in - itself" from the per- ceptual knowledge and pure intellectual cognition perspective. Kant insists on the fundamental difference between the phenomenon and the "thing -in -itself ", to dualism; " Laozi" is towards the unified of "Tao" and all the chaos with the help of survival philosophy; all show certain historical limitations. Practical materialism, one side, affirm the great role of life practice changing the world, creating the history ; On the other hand, affirms that the un- derstanding activity is relatively free, independent value, requiring to maintain the necessary distance, tension of the practice activity and understanding activity. |
| |
Keywords: | Tao thing- in- itself tension |
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|