首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

审查起诉阶段案件退回公安机关处理之探讨
引用本文:杨新京,董丽娟.审查起诉阶段案件退回公安机关处理之探讨[J].国家检察官学院学报,2007,15(3):63-67.
作者姓名:杨新京  董丽娟
作者单位:1. 国家检察官学院,北京,102206
2. 北京市朝阳区人民检察院,北京,100026
摘    要:检察机关在审查起诉阶段将案件退回公安机关自行处理,这在刑事诉讼法没有依据,但在司法实践中却普遍运用,甚至超过了不起诉处理的案件."退处"案件既侵害了犯罪嫌疑人的诉讼权利,也侵害了被害人的权利."退处"案件高居不下的原因主要是因为一些检察机关采用"退处"的方法来降低过高的不起诉率、检察机关没有行政处罚权等等.对此可以从修改刑事诉讼法第15条的规定加强司法机关之间的互相制约、改变不合理的评价指标等方面加以完善.

关 键 词:审查起诉阶段  退回公安机关处理  撤销案件  不起诉
文章编号:1004-9428(2007)03-0063-05

On Cases Returning to the Public Security Organ in the Phase of Examination before Prosecution
Yang Xinjing,Dong Lijuan.On Cases Returning to the Public Security Organ in the Phase of Examination before Prosecution[J].Journal of National Procurators College,2007,15(3):63-67.
Authors:Yang Xinjing  Dong Lijuan
Abstract:It is a ubiquitous practice that the procuratorial organ sends back the case in the phase of examination before prosecution to the public security organ for its independent disposal although the criminal procedure law does not provide any relevant provision. Such cases, in which the procedural rights of both the suspects and the victims are violated, even have outnumbered those in which no prosecution has been initiated, the reason of which is some procuratorial organs attempt to lower the rate of non-prosecution and the lack of administrative penalty power. This practice should be ameliorated by amending article 15 of the criminal procedure law, enhancing mutual restriction of the judicial organs, and reforming unreasonable evaluating guide line.
Keywords:phase of examination before prosecution return a case to the public security organ for disposal withdraw a case non-prosecution
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号