| 关于证据种类之思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 罗海敏.关于证据种类之思考[J].国家检察官学院学报,2005,13(4):140-146. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 罗海敏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学,北京,100088 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文系2002年度司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“我国证据制度的理论与实践问题”课题阶段性成果之一 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 证据种类是根据证据的外在表现形式对证据所作的划分。从英美法系和大陆法系各主要国家及地区看,证据种类的划分主要是以学理讨论的形式出现的,立法往往不对证据种类进行明确的封闭式规定。在我国,三大诉讼法对证据种类作出了明确规定。随着社会的不断发展,我国这种证据种类立法体例的弊端不断显现,亟需予以完善。
|
| 关 键 词： | 证据种类 法定证据种类 完善 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-9428(2005)04-0140-07 |
On the Category of Evidence |
| |
| Luo Haimin.On the Category of Evidence[J].Journal of National Procurators College,2005,13(4):140-146. |
| |
| Authors: | Luo Haimin |
| |
| Abstract: | The category of evidence comes from the classification of evidences by their external forms and such kind of classifica- tion is not definitively closely prescribed by law but mainly a theoretical opinion in most countries of Anglo-Saxon system and Roman-German system.China's three procedural laws demonstrably regulated the category of evidence.However,limitation of this legal frame has gradually emerged with the development of society and relevant laws should be modified. |
| |
| Keywords: | category of evidence statutory category of evidence modifying |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
