首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

比较与借鉴:论反对强迫自证其罪原则
引用本文:刘国庆.比较与借鉴:论反对强迫自证其罪原则[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2013(1):168-174.
作者姓名:刘国庆
作者单位:北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875
摘    要:欧洲国家在适用不强迫自证其罪原则方面有着比较成熟的做法,为了保障被追诉人此项特权的有效性,具体从如下三点着手:其一,将此特权的适用领域拓展至行政法领域。其二,对秘侦措施中的隐秘探话进行必要的限制。其三,对刑事扣押对象进行必要的限制。我国新刑事诉讼法也确立了此项特权,但与之相关的立法存在冲突,有关的配套制度付之阙如,严重影响了被追诉人此项特权的有效性,需要借鉴欧洲人权法院的做法予以完善。

关 键 词:反对强迫自证其罪  刑事扣押  沉默权

Comparisons and Lessons:On the Privilege against Self-incrimination
Liu Guoqing.Comparisons and Lessons:On the Privilege against Self-incrimination[J].Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law,2013(1):168-174.
Authors:Liu Guoqing
Institution:Liu Guoqing (Criminal Law Science Institute, Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875 )
Abstract:European countries have a more mature approach with reference to the application of privilege a- gainst self-incrimination. In order to protect the validity of such privilege by the accused, European countries take effective measures from the following three aspects:first, expanding its application area to the administra- tive law field;second, putting some necessary restrictions on the secret probe among secret surveillance meas- ures ; third, exposing some necessary restrictions on the objects of criminal seizure. The privilege against self-in- crimination has been established in the criminal procedure law amendment. However, there are some conflicts in related legislation and some related systems which seriously affect the validity of the privilege of the ac- cused. This is in need of improvement.
Keywords:privilege against self-incrimination  criminal seizure  the right of silence  reflection
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号