首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

德国吕特案判决五十年来的社会影响
引用本文:曾尔恕,高仰光.德国吕特案判决五十年来的社会影响[J].河南省政法管理干部学院学报,2009,24(3):41-49.
作者姓名:曾尔恕  高仰光
作者单位:中国政法大学,北京,100088
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究项目 
摘    要:1958年1月15日德国联邦宪法法院对吕特案做出的判决,曾经引起德国社会极大的关注。长期以来,该判决确立的一系列重要原则,包括宪法的适用效力可对私法产生间接的辐射效应、客观价值秩序可作为基本权利与私法益发生冲突时的衡量标准、表达自由在基本权利中居于基础性地位等等,已经成为法学界和司法实践部门的共识。50年后的今天,德国法学家对这一判决的历史价值仍表现出持续关注,并做出更为系统的评价。吕特案判决的贡献在于建立了一个普遍适用于战后西方国家的用于解决基本权利冲突的范式。

关 键 词:间接的第三方影响  客观价值秩序  交互作用  基本权利冲突平衡

The Social Impact of the Decision" Lueth vs Veit Harlan" for Fifty Years in Germany
Zeng Ershu,Gao Yangguang.The Social Impact of the Decision" Lueth vs Veit Harlan" for Fifty Years in Germany[J].Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law,2009,24(3):41-49.
Authors:Zeng Ershu  Gao Yangguang
Institution:( China University of Political Science and Law ,Beijing 100088 )
Abstract:The case of Lueth vs Veit Harlan had been caused a great deal of concern in Germany society since its decision was made by the German Federal Constitutional Court in January 15,1958. It has become consensus in the field of law and practice that the decision established a series of important principles for a long time, including the indirect radiance effect of private law caused by constitutional law applying, objective value order being as weighing standard when basic rights and private law interest conflicting, freedom of expression occupying basic positioning in basic rights. In the present day after fifty years, German jurisprudent has still been paying more attention to the historical value of this decision and made more systematic evaluation. The contribution of the decision of the case Lueth vs Veit Harlan lies in establishing a way of dealing with rights conflicts which applies to western countries after the World War Ⅱ.
Keywords:indirect third party effect  objective value order  mutual effect  balance of basic rights conflicts
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号