首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

5种免提取试剂盒检验滤纸血痕结果的比较
引用本文:巴华杰,林子清,刘亚楠,刘冰泉,马骏,朱爱华.5种免提取试剂盒检验滤纸血痕结果的比较[J].中国法医学杂志,2013,28(1):49-51.
作者姓名:巴华杰  林子清  刘亚楠  刘冰泉  马骏  朱爱华
作者单位:1. 常州市公安局刑警支队,江苏常州,213003
2. 中国刑警学院法医学系,辽宁沈阳,110035
3. 上海市公安局物证鉴定中心上海市现场物证重点实验室,上海,200083
摘    要:目的探讨5种免提取试剂盒对滤纸血痕样本检验的效果。方法陈旧滤纸血痕(存放时间12~14个月)及新鲜滤纸血痕(存放时间小于1个月)各920份,分别随机分为5组。应用AGCU 17+1、Goldeneye 20A、Powerplex16HS、Identifiler Plus、Identifiler Direct 5种免提取试剂盒进行检验,对比各组检验结果。结果陈旧滤纸血痕5种试剂盒的检验成功率为98.91%~100%,各组间无差异(P>0.05);新鲜滤纸血痕,Identifiler Plus和Identifiler Direct试剂盒检验成功率高于AGCU17+1、Goldeneye 20A及Powerplex 16HS试剂盒(P<0.01);将样本做陈旧化处理后再用成功率较低的3种试剂盒进行检验,成功率分别升至100%、99.46%、99.46%;Identifiler Plus试剂盒扩增循环27次效果优于28次。结论本文5种试剂盒均可用于滤纸血痕的直接扩增检验,但使用AGCU17+1、Goldeneye 20A及Powerplex 16HS试剂盒需将新鲜血痕做陈旧化处理;Identifiler Plus试剂盒需将循环次数降为27次。

关 键 词:法医物证学  滤纸血痕  免提取试剂盒  直接扩增检验

Comparative study of bloodstain on the filter paper with five different direct PCR amplification kits
Ba Huajie,Lin Ziqing,Liu Yanan,Liu Bingquan,Ma Jun,Zhu Aihua.Comparative study of bloodstain on the filter paper with five different direct PCR amplification kits[J].Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine,2013,28(1):49-51.
Authors:Ba Huajie  Lin Ziqing  Liu Yanan  Liu Bingquan  Ma Jun  Zhu Aihua
Institution:1/(1.Bureau of Changzhou Public Security,Jiangsu Changzhou 213003,China;2.China Criminal Police College,Shenyang 110035,China;3.Shanghai Key Laboratory of Crime Scene Evidence,Institute of Forensic Science,Shanghai Public Security Bureau,Shanghai 200083,China)
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the difference of genotyping profiles of bloodstain samples on the filter paper with five different direct PCR amplification kits.Methods 920 aged bloodstains samples on the filter paper(storage time:12 to 14 months) and 920 fresh bloodstain samples on the filter paper(storage time:less than 1 months) were randomly divided into five groups respectively,and were amplified with AGCU 17+1,Goldeneye 20A,Powerplex 16 HS,Identifiler Plus and Identifiler Direct kits respectively.The results of each groups should be compared each other.Results The success rate of aged bloodstain samples on the filter paper amplified with the five kits ranged from 98.91% to 100%,there were no significant differences between the groups(P>0.05);The success rate of fresh bloodstains on the filter paper amplified with Identifiler Plus and Identifiler Direct kits was higher than AGCU17+1,Goldeneye 20A and Powerplex 16 HS kits(P<0.01);After placing the fresh bloodstains on the filter paper of the three groups with lower success rate at 99℃ for one hour,the success rate were 100%,99.46% and 99.46%;The results of cycle number were 27 were better than 28 with Identifiler Plus kit.Conclusions The five kits used in our study were suitable for direct amplification of bloodstains on the filter paper,while the fresh bloodstains on the filter paper should be ovened at 99℃ for one hour befor direct amplification with AGCU17+1,Goldeneye 20A and Powerplex 16 HS kits;The cycle number should be reduced to 27 with Identifiler Plus kit.
Keywords:forensic biological evidence  bloodstain on the filter paper  direct PCR amplification kits  direct amplification test
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号