专利侵权不停止的司法可能及其实现

按照传统民法程式化处置模式,停止侵害是侵权案件必然的司法后果.但如果将这一模式直接引至专利侵权纠纷的司法过程,则可能发现其中的非必然性.基于科学技术的公共性特质,法院更有可能倾向于在司法过程中促成专利交易,即专利侵权不停止.传统模式的突破,无论从理论解释还是专利实践上均能获致支持.以优化技术资源的市场配置为立场,可以获得“容忍限度论”及“责任规则说”的诠释；无论在国外还是国内,专利侵权不停止业已成为一种现实的司法裁断,而这一过程的实现则仰赖于专利权自身的横向权利结构和对技术目标的诠释.

The Possibility of the Implementation of Judicial Deal in Patent Infringement

According to the stylized disposal model of traditional civil law, to cease the infringement is the inevitable judicial consequence for infringement case. But if putting this model directly in the judicial process of patent infringement, we may find its tentativeness hereof. Based on the publicity character of scientific technology, the court is more likely to promote patent transaction in judicial process, namely don’t cease patent infringement. The breakthrough of traditional mode could get support no matter from the perspective of theory explanation or patent practice. From the position of optimizing the market allocation of technological resources, we will get the explanation of "tolerance limit theory" and "responsibility rule theory"; no matter in foreign or domestic, don’t cease patent infringement has becoming a realistic judicial referee, and the realization of this process depends on its own horizontal right structure of patent right and the interpretation of technological goal.