首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A Comparison of Common Swabbing Materials for the Recovery of Organic and Inorganic Explosive Residues
Authors:David A DeTata MFSc  Peter A Collins BSc  Allan J McKinley PhD
Institution:1. Forensic Science Laboratory, ChemCentre, , Bentley, Western Australia, 6102 Australia;2. School of Biomedical, Biomolecular and Chemical Sciences, University of Western Australia, , Crawley, Western Australia, 6009 Australia
Abstract:The efficiency of solvent based extraction methods used to remove explosive residues from four different swab types was investigated. Known amounts of organic and inorganic residues were spiked onto a swab surface with acetonitrile or ethanol:water combined with ultrasonication or physical manipulation used to extract the residues from each swab. The efficiency of each procedure was then calculated using liquid chromatography‐ultraviolet detection for organic residues and ion chromatography for inorganic residues. Results indicated that acetonitrile combined with physical agitation proved to be the most efficient method; returning analyte recoveries c. 95% for both alcohol based swabs and cotton balls. Inorganic residues were efficiently extracted using ethanol:water, while the use of acetonitrile followed by water significantly reduced the recovery of inorganic residues. Swab storage conditions were then investigated with results indicating decreased storage temperatures are required to retain the more volatile explosives.
Keywords:forensic science  explosive residue  organic explosives  swab  liquid chromatography  ion chromatography
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号