首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国刑法教义学:经验、反思与建构
引用本文:王莹.中国刑法教义学:经验、反思与建构[J].法学家,2020(3):28-40,191,192.
作者姓名:王莹
作者单位:中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心
基金项目:国家社科基金项目“信息刑法时代信息犯罪归责与治理模式研究”(18BFX101)的阶段性成果。
摘    要:当代中国刑法教义学经历了去政治化工具的教义学、作为解释学工具的教义学及作为学科精致化工具的教义学的发展节点。面临实定法的粗疏与缺陷,理论继受过程中的移植落差,中国刑法教义学的发展呈现出诸多特殊的面向。一方面是中国刑法实定法规定的非理性,另一方面是刑法教义学本身的高度理性,二者之间形成了持久的紧张关系,在这种紧张关系之中开展教义学研究需要厘清实定法不可质疑性前提与教义学科学性的关系、立法论与解释论的关系,培育连接立法-司法-法学研究者的教义学共同体,同时警惕对德日刑法教义学的过度路径依赖,积极进行本土化教义学理论的创新与构建。

关 键 词:刑法教义学  法律解释  实定法否定禁令  教义学共同体  教义学本土化

Chinese Criminal law Dogmatics:Experience,Reflection and Construction
WANG Ying.Chinese Criminal law Dogmatics:Experience,Reflection and Construction[J].Jurists Review,2020(3):28-40,191,192.
Authors:WANG Ying
Institution:(Research Center for Criminal Science of Renmin University)
Abstract:The contemporary Chinese criminal law dogmatics has undergone the following development phases:dogmatics as de-politization instrument,as interpretation instrusment and as disciplinary refining instrument.Facing the deficient positive law in the legislation and the theoretical gaps during legal transplantation,the Chinese criminal law dogmatics has developed various characteristical aspects.There exists a lasting tension between the irrationality of regulations of the positive law and the extreme rationality of the dogmatics of criminal law.A sound dogmatics research in this tension should reflect the relationship between the premise of incontestability of positive law(Negationsverbot)and the scientific nature of dogmatics,the relationship between the legislation and hermeneutics,the relationship between the localization and the transplantation of German and Japanese criminal dogmatics.
Keywords:Dogmatics of Criminal Law  Interpretation of Law  Negationsverbot  Dogmatic Professional Community  Localization of Dogmatics
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号