首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

违法合同的效力判定路径之辨识
引用本文:黄忠.违法合同的效力判定路径之辨识[J].法学家,2010(5).
作者姓名:黄忠
作者单位:西南政法大学民商法学院;西南政法大学市场交易法律制度研究基地;
基金项目:洪范法律与经济研究所资助项目“企业间相互借贷诸问题研究”; 西南政法大学2008年度青年项目“无效民事行为研究(08XZ-QN-01)的前期研究成果之一
摘    要:《合同法》第52条第5项及其司法解释对于纠正违法即无效的错误认识曾起到了历史性作用。但现有的学说及现行立法在就违法合同效力的判定路径上却存在着方向性的偏差,于司法实践并不具有真正的指导意义:区分民法内的强制规范与民法外的强制规范而异其效力,在我国并不可行;通过语义分析尚难以发现强制规范之所在;而将违法之法简单缩限为法律、行政法规上的效力性强制性规定,并不妥当,亦难以操作,且于价值及逻辑层面多有疑问;此外,将违法与损害社会公共利益予以并列,在逻辑上也有不合。故应将违法合同的效力判定纳入《合同法》第52条第4项,通过规范目的的发现及利益的衡量来最终确定违法合同的命运。

关 键 词:违法  无效合同  强制规范  社会公共利益  利益衡量  

On the Path to Determine the Validity of Contracts Infringing Mandatory Rules
Huang Zhong,Ph.D.,Lecturer of Civil , Commercial Law School,Researcher of the Center of Legal System Research for Market Trade at Southwest University of Political Science , Law.On the Path to Determine the Validity of Contracts Infringing Mandatory Rules[J].Jurists Review,2010(5).
Authors:Huang Zhong  PhD  Lecturer of Civil  Commercial Law School  Researcher of the Center of Legal System Research for Market Trade at Southwest University of Political Science  Law
Institution:Huang Zhong,Ph.D.,Lecturer of Civil and Commercial Law School,Researcher of the Center of Legal System Research for Market Trade at Southwest University of Political Science and Law
Abstract:The article 58 of General Principles of Civil Law in 1986 says that juristic act in the following categories shall be null and void:(e) those that violate the law or the public interest. The article 52 of Contract Law in 1999 states that a contract is invalid if the contract violates a mandatory provision of any law or administrative regulation.After the Interpretation I of the Supreme People's Court of Several Issues concerning the Application of Contract Law in 1999,people's courts shall base themselves o...
Keywords:Illegality  Invalid Contract  Mandatory Rules  Public Interests  Balance of Benefits  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号