行政执法证据进入刑事诉讼的类型分析——基于比较法的视角

从比较法视角观察,进入刑事诉讼的行政执法证据包括行政机关正当执法获得的证据、行政机关"假借行政调查之名"获得的证据、行政机关与侦查机关"共同调查"获得的证据三种类型。为了提供必要的权利保障,在第一种类型下,行政执法证据进入刑事诉讼应满足一定的程序保障;在第二种类型下,审查的重点是行政调查与刑事侦查的界限,防止行政机关"假借行政调查之名"规避刑事诉讼法的适用;在第三种类型下,应当着重审查"共同调查"中的主导机关、调查措施、调查目的等因素。

The Type Analysis of Using Administrative Evidence in Criminal Procedure:From a Comparative Viewpoint

From a comparative view,administrative evidence that can be used in criminal procedure include three types: evidence obtained by administrative organs in administrative procedure in good faith; evidence obtained by administrative organs‘using administrative investigation as the pretext',evidence obtained through "concurrent investigation"implemented by administrative organs and criminal investigation organs. In order to protect the accused's right,in type Ⅰ,using administrative evidence in criminal procedure shall meet certain safeguards of procedure. In type Ⅱ,the point is drawing the line between administrative and criminal investigations in order to avoid administrative organs' "using administrative investigation as the pretext"to evade the criminal procedure law. In type Ⅲ,the point is to examine which organ should dominate the investigation,what measures could be used in that investigation and what purposes that investigation want to achieve.