首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“四要件论”——质疑犯罪标准引论
引用本文:王敏.“四要件论”——质疑犯罪标准引论[J].金陵法律评论,2004(2):37-42.
作者姓名:王敏
作者单位:南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210097
摘    要:20世纪50年代引自苏联的犯罪构成四要件理论,在新刑法确立罪刑法定原则、废除类推制度后,缺陷凸现,已不能适应新形势下司法实践的要求,难以提供犯罪标准.依犯罪标准为目标的犯罪构成理论应坚持法定性和实践性原则,在科学地解释刑法中对犯罪的全部规定基础上,建立符合刑事司法实践内在逻辑、逐级深化的开放式立体体系.重构犯罪标准理论体系,对于落实罪刑法定原则、解决原理论与司法实践脱节的缺陷,满足司法人员定罪需要具有极其重要的意义.

关 键 词:四要件  犯罪标准  司法实践
文章编号:1001-4608(2004)02-0037-06
修稿时间:2003年2月25日

Queries on"Four Important Items":A Tentative Study of Crime Criteria
WANG Min.Queries on"Four Important Items":A Tentative Study of Crime Criteria[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2004(2):37-42.
Authors:WANG Min
Abstract:After the establishment of legal principles for crime and punishment set by new criminal law and abrogation of analogy system, "four important items" crime theory borrowed from the Soviet Union in 1950s has revealed many deficiencies, which made it difficult to adapt the new situation of judicatory practice and to offer crime criteria. Criterion-based crime theory should adhere to the principles of legality and practice and establish an open, escalating and comprehensive system which is in accordance with the internal logic of judicatory practice on the basis of full understanding of the criminal law.
Keywords:four important items  crime criteria  the judicatory practice
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号