| 中国古代法与现代民法物权制度比较研究——兼及《中华人民共和国物权法（草案）》的相关规定 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李玉生.中国古代法与现代民法物权制度比较研究——兼及《中华人民共和国物权法（草案）》的相关规定[J].金陵法律评论,2005,1(6):46-52. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李玉生 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学法学院 江苏南京210097 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江苏省哲学社会科学规划项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对中国古代法和现代民法物权制度的相关内容进行比较可以发现,中国古代法存在着类似于现代民法动产与不动产的区分,而土地所有权制度则与现行民法有着较大的区别;明清法律关于拾得人可以获得报酬的规定,可以为确立遗失物拾得人的报酬请求权提供历史的依据;古代法并非没有善意取得,只不过其适用范围很窄;土地承包经营权实际上是古代永佃制和"一田两主"习惯的结合;古代的"典"在现代市场经济条件下仍然有其价值,<物权法>应当规定典权制度.
|
| 关 键 词： | 物权制度 所有权 中国古代法 现代民法 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-4608(2005)06-0046-07 |
| 收稿时间： | 08 31 2005 12:00AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年8月31日 |
A Comparative Study of the Rules on Right in Rem in Chinese Ancient Law and Modern Civil Law |
| |
| LI Yu-sheng.A Comparative Study of the Rules on Right in Rem in Chinese Ancient Law and Modern Civil Law[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2005,1(6):46-52. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Yu-sheng |
| |
| Institution: | School of Law, Nanjing Normal Univ. , Nanjing 210097, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Comparing the contents of the rule on right in rem in Chinese ancient law and modern civil law reveals the similar rule on movable and immovable property in Chinese ancient law,but there are more differences in land ownership between them.The order that picker can get rewards in Ming-Qing's law can provide a historical basis to support the reward claim right of picker in modern civil law.The suitable limit of bona fide asset is very narrow.The concept on the right of land contract is applicable to today's China.The right of DIAN should be made in the law of right in rem,because it is still of value in modern market-oriented economy. |
| |
| Keywords: | rule on right in rem Chinese ancient law modern civil law comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
