| 辩护律师证据知悉权独立化研究——以与控方卷证移送关系为视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐治祥.辩护律师证据知悉权独立化研究——以与控方卷证移送关系为视角[J].政法学刊,2009,26(5):71-76. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐治祥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学,重庆,400031;三峡学院,重庆,万州,404000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 无论是英美“起诉状一本主义”还是意大利“法官卷宗”移送制度，都对辩护律师证据知悉权的实现不起决定性作用。在我国司法实践中，辩护律师的证据知悉权因完全依赖于控方卷证移送而受到“主要证据复印件移送主义”的压制。辩护律师证据知悉权只有摆脱控方卷证移送方式的绝对控制，获得自身的独立性，才有可能最大限度地得到实现。
|
| 关 键 词： | 辩护律师 证据知悉 依附 独立 卷证移送 |
The Study of Defense Attorney's Right of Evidence Acquaintance |
| |
| Tang Zhi-xiang.The Study of Defense Attorney's Right of Evidence Acquaintance[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2009,26(5):71-76. |
| |
| Authors: | Tang Zhi-xiang |
| |
| Institution: | Tang Zhi - xiang (1 Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 400031, China ;2 Chonging Three Gorges University, Chongqing 404000, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Neither British American exclusiveness of the bill of prosecution or Italian judge＇s file delivery system plays a decisive role as to the realization of defense attomey＇s right of evidence acquaintance. In China＇s judicial practice, the defense attorney＇sg right of evidence acquaintance completely depends on the delivery mode of the accuser＇s files and evidence. The realization of defense attorney＇s right of evidence acquaintance can be achieved only when defense attorney evade from the complete control of file delivery mode and gain individual independence. |
| |
| Keywords: | defense attorney evidence acquaintance subordination independence file and evidence delivery |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
