首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑事诉讼中司法认知的规制
引用本文:章礼明,容鹢.刑事诉讼中司法认知的规制[J].政法学刊,2009,26(6):57-62.
作者姓名:章礼明  容鹢
作者单位:1. 广州大学,法学院,广东,广州,510006
2. 广东省湛江市人民检察院,广东,湛江,524043
摘    要:诉讼证明是针对案件的“中心事实”,而大量的“背景事实”通常无需提出证据予以证明。这可以通过司法认知得以认定。比较美国和德国刑事诉讼的司法认知规则,两者基本相同,但也略有差异。从诉讼制度传统出发,我国应当借鉴德国的体例,将司法认知确定为两类事实,一类是众所周知的事实;另一类是法官因职业关系已知的事实。

关 键 词:司法认知  诉讼证明  众所周知

Regulations of Judicial Notice with the Criminal Procedure
Zhang Li-ming,Rong Yi.Regulations of Judicial Notice with the Criminal Procedure[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2009,26(6):57-62.
Authors:Zhang Li-ming  Rong Yi
Institution:Zhang Li - ming, Rong Yi( 1. Law school, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China ; 2. Zhanjiang People' s Procuratorate, Zhanjiang 524043, China)
Abstract:The litigation proof is the "center fact" which aims at case, but a great deal of "background facts" usually do not need to put forward a proof. This can be carried out by the judicial notice. Comparative research the United States and Germany of judicial notice rules of criminal procedure, we find that both countries are same alike, but also slightly have difference. With the litigation system tradition, our country shall draw lessons from Germany style. The fact of judicial notice is divided into two types. One type is the well -known fact and the other is the fact which judge has already known because of the occupation.
Keywords:judicial notice  litigation proof  well -known fact
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号