| 后现代法学方法论的理论光谱 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐振东.后现代法学方法论的理论光谱[J].法制与社会发展,2007(4). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐振东 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 厦门大学法学院 福建厦门361005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 后现代法学方法论发展了哲学诠释学的相对主义观点,与科学主义法学形成了尖锐的对立,动摇了法治主义的认识论基础。在后现代法学方法论中,存在着反基础主义、解构主义、新实用主义等几种主要的法律思维形式,它们对法律知识的客观有效性持怀疑的态度,否认法律体系中存在着一以贯之的普遍性标准,也不承认法律可以从某些超越性的道德价值中推导出来,而将法律看作是政治权力角力后的结果,法律的阐释者正是政治权力的体现者。
|
| 关 键 词： | 后现代法学方法论 科学主义 反基础主义 解构主义 新实用主义 |
The Dimension of Theory of Postmodern Legal Methodology |
| |
| XU Zhen-dong.The Dimension of Theory of Postmodern Legal Methodology[J].Law and Social Development,2007(4). |
| |
| Authors: | XU Zhen-dong |
| |
| Abstract: | Postmodern legal methodology accepts conception of relativism of philosophy hermeneutics,pits itself against legal scientism,and strikes epistemological bedrock of the doctrine of rule by law.Postmodern legal methodology includes several important forms of legal mind such as Anti-foundationalism,deconstruction and neo-pragmatism which doubt objectivity and effectivity of legal knowledge and deny that there exist some universal criterions in legal system or law can be derived from some transcendent moral value.According to postmodern legal methodology,law is merely outcome of conflict between political powers embodied by legal interpreter. |
| |
| Keywords: | postmodern legal methodology scientism anti-foundationalism deconstruction neo-pragmatism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
