不当得利返还请求权之再定性

传统民法把不当得利返还权定性为债权而归入债权编,然而这种定性定位不利于保护当事人的合法权益,而且与我国物权变动的有因模式相冲突。通过对不当得利制度的历史考察和价值分析,得出的结论是:它是一种概括的混合的救济权,既可以救济对人性的权利,也可以救济对物性的权利。不当得利、不当得利之债和不当得利返还请求权是不同范畴的概念。

Re-Characterization of Claim of Restitution of Unjust Enrichment

Claim of restitution of unjust enrichment was characterized jus in personam and classified in arrangement of jus in personam in traditional civil law,which do not contribute to protecting the parties legitimate interest and may conflict with the mode of transferring of jus in rem in the light of our civil law.By tracing its history and analyzing its value,this article argues that it is a general and mixed remedial right,which can remedy the jus in personam and in rem.